NGO’s
Now that we
know where and how most of our new-found economic gains are being wasted, let
me present a novel idea that the new enlightened unstained legislators should
seriously consider - to give prominence to the important role of legitimate
non-profit non-government organizations in nation-building.
It is now
acknowledged that most of the country’s new-found impressive economic gains
have been going to the elite, if not to the hidden bank accounts of the corrupt
politicians. The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer and the
middle class migrating.
I sincerely
believe that this proposal can move the great mass of our suffering humanity
forward.
I was involved
in the operation of a health care foundation for a couple of years, but it was
a total exercise in futility. Because of the prevailing suspicion that
foundations are being used as tax shields and for tax avoidance without doing
service to the country or its avowed beneficiaries, the Finance Department of
previous regimes disallowed NGOs to take on quasi for-profit operations, such
as selling services and goods at discounted rates, even if the “profit”
generated was earmarked to the support the foundation’s just causes. Also,
non-profit organizations are legally mandated to use only up to 30% of all
receipts and donations received on all administrative requirements, which, of
course is pitifully unadequate to cover salaries, advertising, marketing, as
well as all contracted services.
It is
important for legislators to review the charter of the Philippine Charity
Sweepstakes Office (PCSO). Being government, PCSO has been subjected to
political misuse, over-use and abuse. But this charter can serve as model on
what legislators can creatively do to enable the shift of wealth being
generated from the very profitable conglomerates towards the lowly non-profit
sector.
Our
enlightened legislators should also consider built-in safeguards against
opportunistic scam artists like those of Janet Napolis – while at the same time serving as conduit
for public funds to be used for legitimate social services.
Currently NGOs’ watchdog is supposed to be the
Philippine Council for NGO Certification (PCNC) – a private group of NGOs that
signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the defunct Department of Finance.
Previous to PCNC, the job was given to NEDA. It was given the authority to
certify NGOs applying for donee institution status based on specific standards.
The certification should then serve as a basis for the BIR to grant incentives
to donor institutions. It was envisioned that this certification process would
encourage local donations to NGOs so significant at this time when resources
channeled to social development projects, including foreign donors, have become
timid. PCNC exists largely to pursue tax
incentives for donors to NGOs.
Evidently, refreshed
legislators can create a law expanding the role of PCNC to allow the non-profit
sector to absorb a bigger share of the new-found economic pie. As we now find
out, the empowered NGO watchdog should be able to prevent the criminal
diversion of scarce funds intended to uplift poverty by pseudo-fundraisers and
other NGOs. This move should be able to do a better job at lifting the majority
from poverty than the CCT dole-outs.
Our
legislators should find ways to allow NGOs to put the following five things
together:
·
They be allowed to use money to lure talent away
from the for-profit sector. At the same time, they can put to productive use
the wasting valuable experience of armed forces retirees and other senior
citizens.
·
They can advertise on anywhere near the scale
that the for-profit sector does to generate donations world-wide.
·
They can take the kinds of risks in pursuit of
those customers that the for-profit sector takes, such as hiring professional
fundraisers. Fundraising has the potential to multiply the amount of money
available for the cause that we care about so deeply.
·
They be allowed a longer gestation period
similar to the amount of time for the for-profit sector.
·
NGOs need to be allowed to take on quasi
for-profit operations, such as selling services and goods at discounted rates,
to make up for the extreme disadvantage of the non-profit sector because
non-profits do not have stake-holders providing capital and motivation.
I do pray somebody is listening.