Archive for June 2015

HEROES AND TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST

6/12/15 -        In today’s news when we are celebrating our 117th Independence Day, many are hailing our sports heroes who are proudly carrying the Philippine flag. The latest is that we have 22 gold medalists in the ongoing South East Asian games good for 7th place.  
        Courage, idealism and death were the stuff of life for Filipinos circa 1892-1900. Intense revolutionary spirit was the fire in the belly of most citizens.
        Gen. Emilio Jacinto was wounded in 1899 in the battle of Maimpis river in Majayjay, Laguna. Bleeding badly, the general was brought to the nearby convento of Magdalena. General Jacinto survived his wounds but died of malaria that same year. He was only 23,  a bold warrior and a keen intellectual who acted as the brains of the Katipunan.
        JosĂ© Rizal, the brilliant novelist-propagandist, established in 1892 the La Liga Filipina movement for reforms, while the fiery Andres Bonifacio founded the Katipunan for armed rebellion.
        In December 1941 right after Japanese fighter planes bombed Pearl Harbor and Clark Field in Pampanga, ushering World War II in the Philippines, Phil-American forces were tasked to repel the Japanese invaders. A lot of our young men in  ROTC uniforms volunteered to go to war. With regular Filipino and American soldiers, these college students were ordered to make the last stand in the jungles of Bataan and the tunnels of Corregidor. They fought a war they couldn’t win because of superior enemy forces on land, sea and air. Heroes all . . .
        Unfortunately for us, the Philippines has also had its fair share of shadowy characters. Countless acts of treachery and turncoatism have undoubtedly darkened several chapters of our history, their after-effects still being felt even up to now.
        Obviously, there are too many traitorous Filipinos to list down. Out of all the groups that collaborated with Japan during World War II, MAKAPILI became the most infamous and hated. Headed by the triumvirate of former Revolutionary General Artemio Ricarte, Pio Duran, and former Sakdalista Movement founder Benigno Ramos, the MAKAPILI came into existence after the Japanese started to conscript Filipinos to augment their military forces.
        The consequences of Mabini’s lost battle to greed perpetuated among succeeding leaders in 1858 clearly hounds all Filipinos to this very day.
        Tremendous discretionary power over public funds, public resources, and public policies is vested in those who capture control of government, and that power has been consolidated, increased, refined, guarded, and avariciously used over the years by the nation’s politicos for their own private and personal gain. Irrespective of any labels or party names that all the presidents, senators, congressmen, governors, mayors, and other government officials have attached to themselves over the last 156 years since, all have been joined – save only for a shamefully miniscule few heroes – by the notion that the positions they occupy are opportunities “to grasp” and not “to serve”. These valiant heroes naturally failed to perpetuate their watch to serve.
        For so many years since our heroes have fallen before my eyes, the realization of a government that would actively fight graft and corruption and where corrupt judges and politicians, tax evaders, smugglers and money launderers would actively be prosecuted and punished, was just wishful thinking on the part of the Filipino people.
        It seems Filipinos harbor a skewed concept of freedom.
        There is now a segment of supposedly “awakened” educated Filipinos who openly state: WHY I AM NOT PROUD TO BE FILIPINO.
        They say: “Filipinos think the “freedom” they supposedly earned in 1986 allows them to do whatever they want, regardless of the consequences. This “freedom” goes hand in hand with their concept of “democracy”. They just go through the motions; elect leaders whose platforms (or lack thereof) they didn’t exhaustively cross-examine, and they express shock that things come out the way they envisioned it to.
        The following question remains without a convincing answer until now: Proud to be Filipino? Of what exactly?
        Obviously, Filipinos have been putting the cart before the horse; they feel pride for some inexplicable thing, then they go find something to feel proud of, however small and inappropriate. But true pride comes from a society building things as a collective, from accomplishing things where each member of that society can feel happy and satisfied knowing that they had a part in building that thing or accomplishment. Not just because they share some semblance of “Filipino blood” with the entity who became successful.
        If Pwede na iyan, Bahala na, and a culture of impunity are the best that Filipinos can do together, well, they get what they deserve.”

        Who therefore can our grandchildren emulate to be declared our hero for the ages? My vote still remains to be with Jose Rizal.

Leave a comment

RIZAL AND THE ATENEO

 Alumnus Jose Rizal kept in touch with the Ateneo mainly through four men. There was Father Faura, who prophesied that he would end up on a scaffold. There was Father Pastells, who sought to restore his Catholic Faith by patient argument. There was Father Balaguer, who reconciled him to the Church before he died. And there was Father Sanchez, who was his friend.
 
I think it can be said that these four men, each in his own fashion, express what the Ateneo should mean, and would like to mean, to all its alumni. The Ateneo is a school; first and foremost, it is a body of teachers; and the essential duty of a teacher is to speak the truth. The truth is often unpleasant, often unpopular; but the teacher, if he wishes to be faithful to his profession, cannot afford to dilute or debase it. He must speak the truth as he sees it, no matter how much it hurts.
 
Rizal had worked out during his sojourn in Spain a thoroughgoing plan of colonial reform. Whatever Father Faura thought of that plan, he saw at least one thing clearly – that the Spanish government would never stand for it. Sooner or later it would try to crush both the plan and its author. That was what he meant when he said that Rizal would end up on a scaffold.
 
We could wish that Father Faura could have put it a little less bluntly, a little more diplomatically. He might have spared Rizal's feelings. But there are times when to spare a man's feelings is to betray his friendship. What Father Faura said was shocking; he meant it to be. He wanted to shock Rizal into seeing that he was faced with a choice, and that his very life depended upon what he chose. He did not tell him what to choose. Rizal was not a boy any longer but a man, and it was a man's privilege to choose; but it was also a man's privilege to be told the consequences of his choice.
 
Rizal saw and chose; and the fact that he chose with his eyes open, with the scaffold at the end of the road having been pointed out to him, is his claim to be our greatest alumnus.
 
All of us, at some time or other in our lives, will be faced with the necessity of making a similar decision. Beset by fears and forebodings, we shall go to seek strength and comfort from those we miss. I do not think we shall ever lack friends who will try to soothe us with ambiguities, who will blur alternatives, dull the horns of a dilemma on the mistaken principle that what we don't know won't burn us, on the childish principle that medicine doesn't taste half as bad if taken with eyes shut.
 
But rare indeed is the friend who will tell us the truth; who will pay us the supreme compliment of assuming that we are not afraid to act on our principles. It is our hope as alumni that we shall always find such a friend where Rizal found him – at the Ateneo.
 
However, it is equally important to remember that respect for the truth must go hand in hand with respect for the individual conscience. To force the truth on the people's minds, to ram the truth down people's throats, is not only unjust: it is unwise. Nothing breeds error so quickly as truth accepted under constraint. It was to be regretted that Rizal lost the priceless heritage of the Faith; but granted the fact that he lost it, there was only one way of restoring it to him: by convincing him, by convincing his mind, that he had erred. There were easier ways; threats, cajolery, flattery, the emotional argument; but Father Pastells used none of these. He chose the hard way; he appealed to that in Rizal which was hardest, diamond-hard- -his mind. For he knew that a faith based on anything else but conviction would be of no use to this man who lived solely by his convictions, and who would not hesitate to die for them.
 
Jesuits believe that their system of education is fashioned to produce men of this calibre, rational men, men whose faith, while fully supernatural, is based on reason. Whether that system actually does so or not, is not for them to say. But this certainly can be said: that if the schools of the free world do not produce such men in greater numbers than hitherto, that world is doomed.
 
We must have men of conviction, but they must also be men of faith. Reason can go far, but there is a point beyond which it cannot go; the deepest questions that reason can ask, only faith can answer. It was Father Pastells who raised these questions in the mind of Rizal, but it was Father Balaguer who answered them. To the death cell in Fort Santiago came this simple man, came, not with subtle argument, not with the persuasive words of human wisdom, but with the word of God, sharp as a drawn sword, cutting deep, even to the marrow of the spirit, cutting and healing, slaying and giving life. And the work that the learned Father Pastells began, this simple priest finished. Yet not he, for what are these but men? Poor, brittle instruments, of what avail are they, of themselves, in the titanic struggle of good and evil for the immortal soul?
 
No, not they, but God, in that lonely hour between dusk and dawn, between life and death, when Rizal sank to his knees at last with a strong cry and tears, in that lonely hour he was alone with the Alone, the man about to die with the God who died, and lives.
 
What folly even to think that such a man, at such an hour, could have been tricked into repentance! If there was trickery in the business, God was the trickster; let them complain to God. If there was trickery in the business, it was prayer that did the trick.
 
There was one man at least whose prayers were with Rizal continually, through all the years of doubt, all the years of agony, all the years of exile; that man was Father Sanchez. Perhaps he was to blame for Rizal's conversion. At any rate, he was the most subtle Jesuit of them all, for he used against Rizal's infidelity the one irresistible weapon; the power against which nothing is proof; the power of prayer.
 
"More things are wrought by prayer than this world dreams of"; and we like to think that among these good things is that fellowship of Ateneans with the Ateneo and of Ateneans among themselves, which not even death can break. For even in maturity, even when we are old, the mother of our youth yet has something to offer us; yes, four things, to all her alumni as to her greatest alumnus: the plain truth, the path of reason, the light of faith, the love of friends.
  

- Horacio de la Costa, SJ

Leave a comment

Search

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark. Converted by LiteThemes.com.